Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Tim Kaine vice presidential campaign, 2016/Energy and environmental policy

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search



BP-Initials-UPDATED.png Ballotpedia's scope changes periodically, and this article type is no longer actively created or maintained. It may also contain neutrality issues.



Tim-Kaine-circle.png

Tim Kaine
Democratic vice presidential nominee
Running mate: Hillary Clinton

Election
Democratic National ConventionPollsPresidential debatesVice presidential debate Presidential election by state

On the issues
Domestic affairsEconomic affairs and government regulationsForeign affairs and national security

Other candidates
Donald Trump (R) • Jill Stein (G) • Gary Johnson (L) • Vice presidential candidates




See what Tim Kaine and the 2016 Democratic Party Platform said about energy and environmental policy below.

Democratic Party Kaine on energy and environmental policy

  • After Hillary Clinton announced that Tim Kaine would be her running mate in July 2016, Trip Pollard, a Richmond-based lawyer with the Southern Environmental Law Center, told Scientific American, "In terms of the broader environmental track record, both as governor and senator, I do think 'moderate' is an accurate label." Pollard also said, "[F]or a Southern Democrat in a state where most lawmakers still won't utter the words 'climate change,' Kaine could be considered moderate to progressive."[1]
  • Kaine received a 91 percent lifetime pro-environment voting score from the League of Conservation Voters. Politico also reported that Kaine had a reputation as a moderate on environmental policy.[2][3]
  • In 2013, Kaine applauded the Obama administration for upgrading national fuel economy standards.[4]
  • Kaine was an early opponent of the Keystone XL Pipeline. In a June 20, 2013, Washington Post op-ed, Kaine explained that he was generally pro-pipeline, but opposed Keystone over his concern about using tar sands oil. He wrote, "By most accounts, oil from tar sands is 15 to 20 percent dirtier than conventional petroleum, and the process of extracting and refining it is more difficult and resource-intensive. With so many cleaner alternatives, there is no reason to embrace the use of a dirtier fuel source. Approving the pipeline would send a clear signal to the markets to expand the development of tar sands oil. Such an expansion would hurt our nation’s work to reduce carbon emissions. We have to make energy cleaner tomorrow than it is today. That’s why the president should block Keystone." Kaine asked, "Why would we embrace a dirtier energy source when smart innovation and policy are opening up so many cleaner alternatives?"[4]
  • In his 2013 op-ed, Kaine also backed a phased approach to reducing carbon emissions without fully abandoning carbon-based energy. While governor of Virginia, he supported building a modern coal plant over converting a pre-Clean Air Act coal plant to natural gas. Kaine supported offshore drilling and energy production in the Atlantic and increasing natural gas production by using new hydro-fracturing techniques.[4]

Recent news

This section links to a Google news search for the term Tim + Kaine + Energy + Environmental + Policy


See also

Footnotes